lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acc065a2-9378-e4fe-9033-d46ebadf2d16@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:59:11 +0800
From:   cruzzhao <cruzzhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix the bug that sched_core_find() may return
 throttled task



在 2022/9/1 下午5:02, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:49:18PM +0800, Cruz Zhao wrote:
>> When a cfs_rq is throttled, the cookie'd task in this cfs_rq wouldn't
>> dequeue from the core tree, and sched_core_find() may return this task,
>> which will result that the throttled task running on the cpu.
>>
>> To resolve this problem, we pick the first cookie matched task and
>> unthrottled task.
> 
> You mean: first that that both matches the cookie and is not throttled.
> 

Yeah, I mean "the first cookie matched and not throttled task".

> Except I think you can have the same problem with the RT crud.

Sure, there's the same problem with the RT crud.

There's also a problem that the priority of the tasks in the core_tree
won't change since sched_core_enqueue(), but the priority of cfs tasks
will change as vruntime changes. And sched_core_find() may not pick the
cookie matched task with the highest priority.

I tried to combine the core_tree with cfs_rq (dl_rq, rt_rq should also
be considered) to solve this problem, but I haven't come up with a
simple and graceful solution yet.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ