[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5a6aea9-4f3a-495e-78fa-e426de9b0496@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:05:53 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com,
eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, mark.rutland@....com,
frederic@...nel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, irogers@...gle.com,
will@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@....com, ananth.narayan@....com, kim.phillips@....com,
santosh.shukla@....com, ravi.bangoria@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
On 29-Aug-22 8:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:04:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:03:47PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>>> @@ -12598,6 +12590,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_create_kernel_counter);
>>>
>>> void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu)
>>> {
>>> +#if 0 // XXX buggered - cpu hotplug, who cares
>>> struct perf_event_context *src_ctx;
>>> struct perf_event_context *dst_ctx;
>>> struct perf_event *event, *tmp;
>>> @@ -12658,6 +12651,7 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu)
>>> }
>>> mutex_unlock(&dst_ctx->mutex);
>>> mutex_unlock(&src_ctx->mutex);
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_migrate_context);
>>>
>>
>> Note to self; fix this :-) I'll see if I have time for that later today.
>
> Urgh, while going through that it appears the whole refcounting thing
> isn't fully done either.
Not sure I follow. Can you please elaborate.
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists