linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] vfs, security: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing NFS sb sharing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152052.1662032833@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:47:13 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
        Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dwysocha@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vfs, security: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing NFS sb sharing

Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> What's the reason for difference between selinux and smack instances of
> context_init?  The former allocates only on submount, the latter -
> unconditionally...

I changed selinux to be conditional, but forgot to do the same to smack.  I'll
fix that.

David