linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable memory hotplug and hotremove config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:12:34 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:     <will@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable memory hotplug and hotremove
 config


On 2022/9/1 18:38, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 09:09:17PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2022/6/30 18:53, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:26:17AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2022/6/29 17:35, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>>> Let's enable ACPI_HMAT, ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY, MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>>>>> and MEMORY_HOTREMOVE for more test coverage, also there are
>>>>> useful for heterogeneous memory scene.
>>>> Hi Catalin and Will，is the defconfig patch picked up from you directly，
>>>> the changelog shows most of them merged by SoC maintainers, but this
>>>> one is some general feature, I don't know who will take it, thanks.
>>> In general we leave the defconfig patches to the SoC team to avoid
>>> conflicts as they have a lot more changes. Cc'ing Arnd if he wants to
>>> pick it up, otherwise it can go through the arm64 tree.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Hi  maintainers,  look this patch is missed, could anyone pick it up,
> I added it to my list of patches for 6.1. I'll queue it around rc6
> unless Arnd takes it before (and of course, if it won't conflict to the
> other SoC changes to defconfig).
Thanks for letting me know that. if conflict, I could rebase and repost.