linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220901133155.GT6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:31:55 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 01:11:14PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:25:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > > > +	if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> > > > +		cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> > > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > A subtle behaviour difference here too: CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL will
> > > now override nohz_full=
> > > 
> > > I don't mind, it's probably what we want in the end, but the changelog should
> > > tell about it, or even better, this should be a separate change.
> > 
> > Good point.  Perhaps the key point is that if there is nohz_full=,
> > rcu_nocbs=, and CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL, we still need rcu_nocbs=
> > to include at least those bits set by nohz_full=.
> 
> Not sure I get what you mean. nohz_full= should in any case always force
> rcu_nocbs at least on the nohz_full CPUs.
> 
> For example assuming the following combination: rcu_nocbs=6, nohz_full=7 AND
> CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y, then the result should be:
> 
> NOCB CPUs = 6,7
> NOHZ_FULL CPUs = 7
> 
> (CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y is overriden by rcu_nocbs=6).
> 
> Now if we have nohz_full=7 AND CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y, then the
> result is expected to be either:
> 
> NOCB CPUs = 7 (upstream behaviour)
> NOHZ_FULL CPUs = 7
> 
> or 
> 
> NOCB CPUs = all
> NOHZ_FULL CPUs = 7
> 
> The second makes more sense IMHO but that should be in a separate change.

Your examples are consistent with what I was trying to say.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul