[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZwkhvM7JGeisdAyh4Bg2hx5E+dSG89Psb=13hD+wkjoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:26:06 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
Cc: linux-imx@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, aisheng.dong@....com,
stefan@...er.ch, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net, soc@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, abel.vesa@....com, dev@...xeye.de,
marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, tharvey@...eworks.com,
leoyang.li@....com, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
cniedermaier@...electronics.com, clin@...e.com,
giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Add support for i.MXRT1170-evk
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 2:57 PM Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com> wrote:
> On 9/2/22 04:06, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 8:33 PM Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch contains:
> >> - Update to imxrt_defconfig
> >> - Devicetree
> >> - Clock driver
> >> - Pinctrl driver
> >
> > No it does not, I already merged that.
> >
> > I think you should probably split up your series per-subsystem so the
> > clock bindings and changes can be merged separately etc.
> >
> > Then the DTS files can be added to the ARM SoC tree as a final step.
> >
> > When you send everything in one bundle like this subsystem maintainers
> > don't know if they can merge e.g. just the clock patches separately
> > and be done with their part (like what I did with pinctrl).
>
> Do you think its possible to add Docs for Device tree compatibles that
> aren't added yet?
Bindings and drivers are orthogonal, we only submit them together
to provide context for reviewers.
It is also possible to submit device trees with compatibles and entire
nodes without bindings because there essentially is no real police for
this. Of course it is not recommended.
If you are confident that bindings and device trees will come in the
same merge window it is fine to merge them separately through different
trees.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists