[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxIFJEz05hY9DWFO@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:29:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Xuezhi Zhang <zhangxuezhi1@...lpad.com>,
Yangxi Xiang <xyangxi5@...il.com>,
nick black <dankamongmen@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
tangmeng <tangmeng@...ontech.com>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/panic: Drop unblank_screen call
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 13:35, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 2022-08-30 16:50:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > console_unblank() does this too (called in both places right after),
> > > and with a lot more confidence inspiring approach to locking.
> > >
> > > Reconstructing this story is very strange:
> > >
> > > In b61312d353da ("oops handling: ensure that any oops is flushed to
> > > the mtdoops console") it is claimed that a printk(" "); flushed out
> > > the console buffer, which was removed in e3e8a75d2acf ("[PATCH]
> > > Extract and use wake_up_klogd()"). In todays kernels this is done way
> > > earlier in console_flush_on_panic with some really nasty tricks. I
> > > didn't bother to fully reconstruct this all, least because the call to
> > > bust_spinlock(0); gets moved every few years, depending upon how the
> > > wind blows (or well, who screamed loudest about the various issue each
> > > call site caused).
> > >
> > > Before that commit the only calls to console_unblank() where in s390
> > > arch code.
> > >
> > > The other side here is the console->unblank callback, which was
> > > introduced in 2.1.31 for the vt driver. Which predates the
> > > console_unblank() function by a lot, which was added (without users)
> > > in 2.4.14.3. So pretty much impossible to guess at any motivation
> > > here. Also afaict the vt driver is the only (and always was the only)
> > > console driver implementing the unblank callback, so no idea why a
> > > call to console_unblank() was added for the mtdooops driver - the
> > > action actually flushing out the console buffers is done from
> > > console_unlock() only.
> >
> > My understanding is that mtdoops is not a real console. The commit
> > 4b23aff083649eafa141 ("[MTD] oops and panic message logging to MTD
> > device") suggests that it was just (mis)using the console
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > The commit 2e386e4bac90554887e73d ("mtd: mtdoops: refactor as a
> > kmsg_dumper") converted it to use the new kmsg_dumper API that
> > was created for this use case.
> >
> > So, I would consider all the mtdoops-related changes as a misuse
> > of the console API.
>
> Ah, that's a good piece of information that I didn't figure out.
>
> Greg, if you haven't baked in the patch yet, can you perhaps add the
> above information from Petr to the commit message?
It's already baked, sorry :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists