[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220902022918.169173-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:29:18 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: Adjust arch_do_signal_or_restart() to adapt generic entry
Commit 8ba62d37949e248c69 ("task_work: Call tracehook_notify_signal from
get_signal on all architectures") adjust arch_do_signal_or_restart() for
all architectures. LoongArch hasn't been upstream yet at that time and
can be still built successfully without adjustment because this function
has a weak version with the correct prototype. It is obviously that we
should convert LoongArch to use new API, otherwise some signal handlings
will be lost.
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c
index 7f4889df4a17..8f5b7986374b 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c
@@ -529,11 +529,11 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
signal_setup_done(ret, ksig, 0);
}
-void arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs, bool has_signal)
+void arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct ksignal ksig;
- if (has_signal && get_signal(&ksig)) {
+ if (get_signal(&ksig)) {
/* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
handle_signal(&ksig, regs);
return;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists