[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220902185148.635292-1-ahalaney@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:51:45 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
johan@...nel.org, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: dt-binding fixups
Hi,
This is my poor attempt at getting devicetree validation into a better
state for qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml. This is a follow-up to Johan's
request for this over here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/Yw8EE%2FESDUnIRf8P@hovoldconsulting.com/
In particular, I'm not certain patch 1 is the correct way to handle
things, and patch 2 makes validation too wide for the *-supply nodes.
I'd love any feedback here as I'm really not experienced in any of the
spaces (regulator, rpmh, or dt schema) so nit picking is welcomed.
Thanks in advance,
Andrew
Andrew Halaney (3):
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Use additionalProperties
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Specify supply property
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Indicate regulator-allow-set-load
dependencies
.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists