linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:29:50 -0400
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com
Cc:     heiko@...ech.de, ajones@...tanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, guoren@...nel.org,
        apatel@...tanamicro.com, atishp@...osinc.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing

On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:26:21PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> >> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> >>
> >> but now it looks like I need to go back and reply to each patch
> >> separately.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if tooling like b4 can handle Reviewed-by's in cover-letters.
> 
> Yup, it can! At least `b4 {am,shazam} -t` will.
> I am not sure if the new `b4 trailers` does.

Yes, it's the default behaviour for "b4 trailers". It'll probably become the
default for "b4 am/shazam" at some point, too.

-K