[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002ab1f2-078e-2bce-83a0-257a573b1f95@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:23:34 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, dave@...olabs.net,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
void@...ifault.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, changbin.du@...el.com,
ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, arnd@...db.de,
jbaron@...mai.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Code tagging framework and applications
On 9/2/22 2:05 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 01:53:53PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I've complained about memcg accounting before, the slowness of it is why
>> io_uring works around it by caching. Anything we account we try NOT do
>> in the fast path because of it, the slowdown is considerable.
>
> I'm with you on that, it definitely raises an eyebrow.
>
>> You care about efficiency now? I thought that was relegated to
>> irrelevant 10M IOPS cases.
>
> I always did, it's just not the only thing I care about.
It's not the only thing anyone cares about.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists