linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in preparation for phylink conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:32:33 -0400
From:   Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in
 preparation for phylink conversion

Hi Jakub,

On 8/18/22 3:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:14:04 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > Ack, no question. I'm trying to tell you got to actually get stuff in.
>> > It's the first week after the merge window and people are dumping code
>> > the had written over the dead time on the list, while some reviewers
>> > and maintainers are still on their summer vacation. So being
>> > considerate is even more important than normally.  
>> 
>> OK, so perhaps a nice place to split the series is after patch 11. If
>> you would like to review/apply a set of <15 patches, that is the place
>> to break things. I can of course resend again with just those, if that's
>> what I need to do to get these applied.
> 
> Mm, okay, let's give folks the customary 24h to object, otherwise I'll
> pull in the first 11 tomorrow.

OK, it's been around two weeks. Aside from one bugfix (thanks Dan), there
has been no further feedback on this series. Can we apply the second half?

--Sean