[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220902040122.346654-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:01:22 -0700
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
CC: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Report Protected KVM cap only if KVM is enabled
If "kvm-arm.mode=protected" is present on kernel command line, but the
kernel doesn't actually support KVM because it booted from EL1, the
ARM64_KVM_PROTECTED_MODE capability is misleadingly reported as present.
Fix this by adding a check whether we booted from EL2.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 8d88433de81d..866667be0651 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ static void cpu_enable_mte(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
static bool is_kvm_protected_mode(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused)
{
- return kvm_get_mode() == KVM_MODE_PROTECTED;
+ return is_hyp_mode_available() && kvm_get_mode() == KVM_MODE_PROTECTED;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_KVM */
base-commit: 0982c8d859f8f7022b9fd44d421c7ec721bb41f9
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists