[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxGV33HTiWQ39Bkp@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:34:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for
constant expressions
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:06:48AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Unless Boris feels strong enough to nack the series, I think Yury
> accepting the series is the way to go.
arch/x86/ patches go through the tip tree unless there's a compelling
reason to carry them through another. I don't see one here.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists