linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 updated] mm/demotion: Expose memory tier details via sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <698120ce-d4df-3d13-dea9-a8f5c298783c@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:16:14 +0530
From:   Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        jvgediya.oss@...il.com, Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 updated] mm/demotion: Expose memory tier details via
 sysfs

On 9/2/22 11:10 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> On 9/2/22 10:39 AM, Wei Xu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 5:33 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/1/22 12:31 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>>>>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch adds /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/ where all memory tier
>>>>>>> related details can be found. All allocated memory tiers will be listed
>>>>>>> there as /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The nodes which are part of a specific memory tier can be listed via
>>>>>>> /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/nodes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think "memory_tier" is a better subsystem/bus name than
>>>>>> memory_tiering.  Because we have a set of memory_tierN devices inside.
>>>>>> "memory_tier" sounds more natural.  I know this is subjective, just my
>>>>>> preference.
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>> I missed replying to this earlier. I will keep memory_tiering as subsystem name in v4 
>> because we would want it to a susbsystem where all memory tiering related details can be found
>> including memory type in the future. This is as per discussion 
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAAPL-u9TKbHGztAF=r-io3gkX7gorUunS2UfstudCWuihrA=0g@mail.gmail.com
> 
> I don't think that it's a good idea to mix 2 types of devices in one
> subsystem (bus).  If my understanding were correct, that breaks the
> driver core convention.
> 

All these are virtual devices .I am not sure i follow what you mean by 2 types of devices.
memory_tiering is a subsystem that represents all the details w.r.t memory tiering. It shows
details of memory tiers and can possibly contain details of different memory types .

-aneesh