lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d96d36-fd13-2268-122b-fea806090942@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:02:19 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the block tree

On 9/1/22 07:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> So I see two obvious solutions. Either:
>>
>> a) Only do the first two patches for now, and leave them in Andrew's
>> tree. After the next release, do the remaining 5 patches via the block
>> tree, or
>>
>> b) Move the whole series to the block tree now, or
>>
>> c) something else?
>>
>> Andrew, Jens, any preference here? 
> 
> Would've been cleaner to take through the block tree given what
> it touches, imho. Or at least base on that, so we'd avoid frivolous
> conflicts like this.
> 

OK, so I'm new to block, and my first guess at the right git tree
and branch:

    git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block block-6.0

 doesn't seem to contain this one:

    e88811bc43b9 ("block: use on-stack page vec for <= UIO_FASTIOV")

Can you point me to the right tree please?

Once I know the right block tree to use, I could post the next version
rebased on top of that. And plan to send it up through Jens' block tree,
assuming that it continues to survive the reviews, that is.

Andrew, is that OK with you? The first two patches will still get
reviewed by mm, and they shouldn't conflict with mm, even if they
go up through the block tree.


thanks,

-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ