lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d8859bc-80d6-08b0-fd40-8874df4d3419@linux.dev>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:42:42 +0800
From:   Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, song@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/3] md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock

Hi,

On 8/29/22 9:15 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> +static bool wait_barrier_nolock(struct r10conf *conf)
> +{
> +	unsigned int seq = raw_read_seqcount(&conf->resync_lock.seqcount);
> +
> +	if (seq & 1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (READ_ONCE(conf->barrier))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending);
> +	if (!read_seqcount_retry(&conf->resync_lock.seqcount, seq))

I think 'seq' is usually get from read_seqcount_begin.

> +		return true;
> +
> +	atomic_dec(&conf->nr_pending);
> +	return false;
> +

Thanks,
Guoqing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ