[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96f90e1d-aa0f-1c76-bfc9-a87e978ad655@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:02:02 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: <agk@...hat.com>, <snitzer@...nel.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <hch@....de>,
<pankydev8@...il.com>, <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
<hare@...e.de>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <matias.bjorling@....com>,
<gost.dev@...sung.com>, <bvanassche@....org>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 12/13] dm: introduce DM_EMULATED_ZONES target type
On 2022-09-02 02:28, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23 2022 at 8:18P -0400,
> Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>> Introduce a new target type DM_EMULATED_ZONES for targets with
>> a different number of sectors per zone (aka zone size) than the underlying
>> device zone size.
>>
>> This target type is introduced as the existing zoned targets assume
>> that the target and the underlying device have the same zone size.
>> The new target: dm-po2zone will use this new target
>> type as it emulates the zone boundary that is different from the
>> underlying zoned device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
>
> This patch's use of "target type" jargon isn't valid.
>
> Please say "target feature flag" and rename DM_EMULATED_ZONES to
> DM_TARGET_EMULATED_ZONES in the subject and header.
> Good catch. I will fix it up for the next version.
> But, with those fixed:
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
>
You mean <Reviewed-By> ? :)
> (fyi, I'll review patch 13, the dm-po2zone target, tomorrow)
>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists