linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] btrfs: Remove the unneeded result variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:23:47 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] btrfs: Remove the unneeded result variable

On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 07:48:10AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>
> 
> Return the sysfs_emit() directly instead of storing it in another
> redundant variable.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>

There's another patch doing a similar cleanup in btrfs_load_inode_props,
can you please resend so it's all done in one patch? I did not want to
apply a single fix but now that there are a few more instances of the
pattern it makes slightly more sense to apply it. Thanks.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220830083914.276926-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn/