linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 27/30] Code tagging based latency tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:59:25 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org,
        roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net,
        willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, void@...ifault.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
        peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        changbin.du@...el.com, ytcoode@...il.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com,
        dvyukov@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
        arnd@...db.de, jbaron@...mai.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 27/30] Code tagging based latency tracking

On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:35:32 -0400
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 08:23:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > If ftrace, perf, bpf can't do what you want, take a harder look to see if
> > you can modify them to do so.  
> 
> Maybe we can use this exchange to make both of our tools better. I like your
> histograms - the quantiles algorithm I've had for years is janky, I've been
> meaning to rip that out, I'd love to take a look at your code for that. And
> having an on/off switch is a good idea, I'll try to add that at some point.
> Maybe you got some ideas from my stuff too.
> 
> I'd love to get better tracepoints for measuring latency - what I added to
> init_wait() and finish_wait() was really only a starting point. Figuring out
> the right places to measure is where I'd like to be investing my time in this
> area, and there's no reason we couldn't both be making use of that.

Yes, this is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not against your work, I
just want you to work more with everyone to come up with ideas that can
help everyone as a whole. That's how "open source communities" is suppose
to work ;-)

The histogram and synthetic events can use some more clean ups. There's a
lot of places that can be improved in that code. But I feel the ideas
behind that code is sound. It's just getting the implementation to be a bit
more efficient.

> 
> e.g. with kernel waitqueues, I looked at hooking prepare_to_wait() first but not
> all code uses that, init_wait() got me better coverage. But I've already seen
> that that misses things, too, there's more work to be done.

I picked prepare_to_wait() just because I was hacking up something quick
and thought that was "close enough" ;-)

-- Steve