linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/73] 5.15.65-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxMw2C/Jl7SxNH5+@debian>
Date:   Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:47:52 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/73] 5.15.65-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:18:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.65 release.
> There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:13:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Note:
x86_64 allmodconfig failed with gcc-12 with the error:

drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c: In function 'ipc_protocol_dl_td_process':
drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:406:13: error: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'cb' will never be NULL [-Werror=address]
  406 |         if (!IPC_CB(skb)) {
      |             ^
In file included from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.h:9,
                 from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol.h:9,
                 from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:6:
./include/linux/skbuff.h:794:33: note: 'cb' declared here
  794 |         char                    cb[48] __aligned(8);

It will need dbbc7d04c549 ("net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check").


Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1757
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1760
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1762

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip