[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxM3d6VB51sbZPYV@T590>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 19:16:07 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/6] ublk_drv: refactor ublk_cancel_queue()
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:51:32PM +0800, ZiyangZhang wrote:
> Assume only a few FETCH_REQ ioucmds are sent to ublk_drv, then the
> ubq_daemon exits, We have to call io_uring_cmd_done() for all ioucmds
> received so that io_uring ctx will not leak.
>
> ublk_cancel_queue() may be called before START_DEV or after STOP_DEV,
> we decrease ubq->nr_io_ready and clear UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE so that we
> won't call io_uring_cmd_done() twice for one ioucmd to avoid UAF. Also
> clearing UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE makes the code more reasonable.
>
> Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists