| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YxPOfVMzRWEa7xqf@google.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 22:00:29 +0000
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com, urezki@...il.com,
neeraj.iitr10@...il.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
vineeth@...byteword.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/18] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API
implementation
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[..]
> > +
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
> >
> > trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, reason);
> [...]
> > @@ -705,12 +816,21 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> > my_rdp->nocb_gp_gp = needwait_gp;
> > my_rdp->nocb_gp_seq = needwait_gp ? wait_gp_seq : 0;
> >
> > - if (bypass && !rcu_nocb_poll) {
> > - // At least one child with non-empty ->nocb_bypass, so set
> > - // timer in order to avoid stranding its callbacks.
> > - wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS,
> > - TPS("WakeBypassIsDeferred"));
> > + // At least one child with non-empty ->nocb_bypass, so set
> > + // timer in order to avoid stranding its callbacks.
> > + if (!rcu_nocb_poll) {
> > + // If bypass list only has lazy CBs. Add a deferred
> > + // lazy wake up.
> > + if (lazy && !bypass) {
> > + wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
> > + TPS("WakeLazyIsDeferred"));
>
> What if:
>
> 1) rdp(1) has lazy callbacks
> 2) all other rdp's have no callback at all
> 3) nocb_gp_wait() runs through all rdp's, everything is handled, except for
> these lazy callbacks
> 4) It reaches the above path, ready to arm the RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY timer,
> but it hasn't yet called wake_nocb_gp_defer()
> 5) Oh but rdp(2) queues a non-lazy callback. interrupts are disabled so it defers
> the wake up to nocb_gp_wait() with arming the timer in RCU_NOCB_WAKE.
> 6) nocb_gp_wait() finally calls wake_nocb_gp_defer() and override the timeout
> to several seconds ahead.
> 7) No more callbacks queued, the non-lazy callback will have to wait several
> seconds to complete.
>
> Or did I miss something? Note that the race exists with RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS
> but it's only about one jiffy delay, not seconds.
>
So I think the below patch should fix that. But I have not tested it at all
and it could very well have issues. In particular, there is a likelihood of a
wake up while holding a lock which I'm not sure is safe due to scheduler
locks. I'll test it next week. Let me know any thoughts though.
---8<-----------------------
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix race where wake_nocb_gp_defer() lazy wake can
overwrite a non-lazy wake
Fix by holding nocb_gp_lock when observing the state of all rdps. If any
rdp queued a non-lazy CB, we would do a wake up of the main gp thread.
This should address the race Frederick reported (which could effect both
non-lazy CBs using the bypass list, and lazy CBs, though lazy CBs much
more noticeably).
Quoting from Frederic's email:
1) rdp(1) has lazy callbacks
2) all other rdp's have no callback at all
3) nocb_gp_wait() runs through all rdp's, everything is handled, except for
these lazy callbacks
4) It reaches the above path, ready to arm the RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY timer,
but it hasn't yet called wake_nocb_gp_defer()
5) Oh but rdp(2) queues a non-lazy callback. interrupts are disabled so it defers
the wake up to nocb_gp_wait() with arming the timer in RCU_NOCB_WAKE.
6) nocb_gp_wait() finally calls wake_nocb_gp_defer() and override the timeout
to several seconds ahead.
7) No more callbacks queued, the non-lazy callback will have to wait several
seconds to complete.
Here, the nocb gp lock is held when #4 happens. So the deferred wakeup
on #5 has to wait till #4 finishes.
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 8b46442e4473..6690ece8fe20 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -285,14 +285,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush);
* Arrange to wake the GP kthread for this NOCB group at some future
* time when it is safe to do so.
*/
-static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
- const char *reason)
+static void __wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
+ const char *reason, bool locked)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_data *rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
unsigned long mod_jif = 0;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
+ if (!locked)
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
/*
* Bypass and lazy wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case of
@@ -323,11 +324,23 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
if (rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup < waketype)
WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
+ if (!locked)
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, reason);
}
+static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
+ const char *reason) {
+ __wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, waketype, reason, false);
+}
+
+
+static void wake_nocb_gp_defer_locked(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
+ const char *reason) {
+ __wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, waketype, reason, true);
+
/*
* Flush the ->nocb_bypass queue into ->cblist, enqueuing rhp if non-NULL.
* However, if there is a callback to be enqueued and if ->nocb_bypass
@@ -754,6 +767,8 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
* is added to the list, so the skipped-over rcu_data structures
* won't be ignored for long.
*/
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&my_rdp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rdp, &my_rdp->nocb_head_rdp, nocb_entry_rdp, 1) {
bool needwake_state = false;
bool flush_bypass = false;
@@ -855,14 +870,15 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
// If bypass list only has lazy CBs. Add a deferred
// lazy wake up.
if (lazy && !bypass) {
- wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
+ wake_nocb_gp_defer_locked(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
TPS("WakeLazyIsDeferred"));
// Otherwise add a deferred bypass wake up.
} else if (bypass) {
- wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS,
+ wake_nocb_gp_defer_locked(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS,
TPS("WakeBypassIsDeferred"));
}
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&my_rdp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
if (rcu_nocb_poll) {
/* Polling, so trace if first poll in the series. */
--
2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists