lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220904230713.a461f8fe85329663226c755f@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 23:07:13 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: CONFIG_RETHUNK int3 filling prevents kprobes in function body

Hi Peter,

I found that the CONFIG_RETHUNK code (path_return) fills the unused bytes
with int3 for padding. Unfortunately, this prevents kprobes on the function
body after the return code (e.g. branch blocks placed behind the return.)

This is because kprobes decodes function body to ensure the probed address
is an instruction boundary, and if it finds the 0xcc (int3), it stops
decoding and reject probing because the int3 is usually used for a
software breakpoint and is replacing some other instruction. Without
recovering the instruction, it can not continue decoding safely.

Can we use another instruction for padding instead of INT3? (e.g. NOP or UD2)

Or, can I expect the instruction length in __return_sites[] are always 5?
If so, I can just skip 5 bytes if the address is in __return_sites[].

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ