lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxTU4WU3KRco14YL@minyard.net>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 11:40:01 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To:     Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi:ipmb: Fix double word in comments

On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 12:02:20PM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete the rebundant word "response" in comments.

That's not redundant.  That's a "response to a response".  It would be
easier to read as "response to the response".  I'll fix that and the
other obvious typo there.

-corey

> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> index 25c010c9ec25..0966e95666ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void ipmi_ipmb_send_response(struct ipmi_ipmb_dev *iidev,
>  	if ((msg->data[0] >> 2) & 1) {
>  		/*
>  		 * It's a response being sent, we needto return a
> -		 * response response.  Fake a send msg command
> +		 * response.  Fake a send msg command
>  		 * response with channel 0.  This will always be ipmb
>  		 * direct.
>  		 */
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ