linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: mcp320x: add triggered buffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:29:00 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Cc:     kernel <kernel@...s.com>, "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Axel Jonsson <Axel.Jonsson@...s.com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: mcp320x: add triggered buffer support

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:47:50 +0200
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 07:24:30PM +0200, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:40:02 +0200
> > Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:  
> > > Add support for triggered buffers.  Just read the channels in a loop to
> > > keep things simple.  
> > 
> > Just curious, but what other options are there?  A quick datasheet scroll
> > through didn't seem to suggest you can overlap setup of next read with
> > reading out the previous (common on SPI ADCs).  
> 
> You're right that the hardware doesn't support any special method to
> read out multiple channels; I can mention that in the commit message.
> But I think you could construct a spi_message which a bunch of
> spi_transfers which toggle the CS appropriately between them to read out
> multiple channels in one go?  (Note that the variants have different
> data formats, and many of the variants only have one channel.)

That might be a little more efficient on a suitably advanced
SPI controller, or where the overhead of jumping between drivers
is large, but in many cases it won't save that much.

Would need an experiment on a platform someone cares about to decide
if it is worthwhile.

Jonathan