linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove runtime PM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:51:59 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove runtime PM support

On 19-08-22, 14:10, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:06:12PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Currently, the dw-edma driver enables the runtime_pm for parent device
> > (chip->dev) and increments/decrements the refcount during alloc/free
> > chan resources callbacks.
> > 
> > This leads to a problem when the eDMA driver has been probed, but the
> > channels were not used. This scenario can happen when the DW PCIe driver
> > probes eDMA driver successfully, but the PCI EPF driver decides not to
> > use eDMA channels and use iATU instead for PCI transfers.
> > 
> > In this case, the underlying device would be runtime suspended due to
> > pm_runtime_enable() in dw_edma_probe() and the PCI EPF driver would have
> > no knowledge of it.
> > 
> > Ideally, the eDMA driver should not be the one doing the runtime PM of
> > the parent device. The responsibility should instead belong to the client
> > drivers like PCI EPF.
> > 
> > So let's remove the runtime PM support from eDMA driver.
> > 
> > Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> > Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> Looks like this one missed 6.0. Vinod, can you please merge this now?

This fails for me, can you pls rebase and resend

-- 
~Vinod