[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166231195330.2423948.5394487959576836993.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 19:22:21 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Tom Fitzhenry <tom@...-fitzhenry.me.uk>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:00:39 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
> PinePhone Pro is a RK3399 based phone produced by Pine64.
>
> Add a basic DTS for it. This is a working base that will allow myself and
> others to add more nodes.
>
> Relies on "dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add PinePhone Pro bindings"[0].
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
commit: 78a21c7d59520e72ebea667fe8745a4371d9fe86
Why was the dt-binding addition missing?
I've pulled the binding from v3 now.
While it is true that you should not resend patches just to add Acks,
when re-sending a whole series that includes other changes it's still
necessary to keep all patches together ;-)
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists