[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ac67d1f-e5b5-2687-372f-4146eed5cc5d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:32:14 +0200
From: Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nouveau Dev <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/41] drm/modes: Add a function to generate analog
display modes
Hi Maxime,
W dniu 5.09.2022 o 15:32, Maxime Ripard pisze:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:14:28AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> +enum drm_mode_analog {
>>>> + DRM_MODE_ANALOG_NTSC,
>>>> + DRM_MODE_ANALOG_PAL,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Using "NTSC" and "PAL" to describe the 50Hz and 60Hz analog TV modes is common,
>>> but strictly speaking a misnomer. Those are color encoding systems, and your
>>> patchset fully supports lesser used, but standard encodings for those (e.g.
>>> PAL-M for 60Hz and SECAM for 50Hz). I'd propose switching to some more neutral
>>> naming scheme. Some ideas:
>>>
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_60_HZ / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_50_HZ (after standard refresh rate)
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_525_LINES / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_625_LINES (after standard line
>>> count)
>>
>> IMHO these are bad names, as e.g. VGA640x480@60 is also analog, using
>> 60 Hz and 525 lines. Add "TV" to the name?
>>
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_JM / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_BDGHIKLN (after corresponding ITU System
>>> Letter Designations)
>>
>> Or DRM_MODE_ITU_*?
>> But given the long list of letters, this looks fragile to me.
>
> Does it matter at all? It's an internal API that isn't exposed at all.
> I'd rather have a common name that everyone can understand in this case
> rather than a *perfect* name where most will scratch their head
> wondering what it's about.
You may have a point. But in that case, maybe it'd make sense to at least add
a short comment explaining what do you mean by "NTSC" and "PAL" in this context?
Best regards,
Mateusz Kwiatkowski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists