linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arch_topology: Make cluster topology span at least SMT CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220905170723.ppikgcjtjwe2nj63@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:07:23 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Cc:     vincent.guittot@...aro.org, ionela.voinescu@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, 21cnbao@...il.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...wei.com,
        yangyicong@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch_topology: Make cluster topology span at least
 SMT CPUs

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:26:15PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> 
> Currently cpu_clustergroup_mask() will return CPU mask if cluster span more
> or the same CPUs as cpu_coregroup_mask(). This will result topology borken
> on non-Cluster SMT machines when building with CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y.
> 
> Test with:
> qemu-system-aarch64 -enable-kvm -machine virt \
>  -net none \
>  -cpu host \
>  -bios ./QEMU_EFI.fd \
>  -m 2G \
>  -smp 48,sockets=2,cores=12,threads=2 \
>  -kernel $Image \
>  -initrd $Rootfs \
>  -nographic
>  -append "rdinit=init console=ttyAMA0 sched_verbose loglevel=8"
> 
> We'll get below error:
> [    3.084568] BUG: arch topology borken
> [    3.084570]      the SMT domain not a subset of the CLS domain
> 
> Since cluster is a level higher than SMT, fix this by making cluster
> spans at least SMT CPUs.
> 
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Sorry for missing to figure this out earlier and thanks for fixing it.
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep