[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxZT7tDhW/7T+Snl@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:54:22 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] PCI: aardvark: switch to using
devm_gpiod_get_optional()
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:47:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:02 AM Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:58 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
> > > device property API.
> > >
> > > I believe that the only reason the driver, instead of the standard
> > > devm_gpiod_get_optional(), used devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() is
> > > because it wanted to set up a pretty consumer name for the GPIO,
> >
> > IIRC consumer name is not used at all.
>
> It's. The user space tools use it as a label. So, GPIO line can have
> "name" (this is provider specific) and "label" (which is consumer
> specific, i.o.w. how we use this line).
>
> ...
>
> > > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get reset-gpio: %i\n",
> > > + ret);
> > > + return ret;
>
> I understand that in the input subsystem maintainer's hat you don't
> like dev_err_probe(), but it's a good case to have it here.
The driver currently does not use this API, so I elected not to
introduce it in this series.
Thanks,
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists