[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21f2241f19003a1210bd475883ee077b@walle.cc>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:24:43 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctr: microchip-sgpio: Correct the
fwnode_irq_get() return value check
Am 2022-09-05 21:08, schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> fwnode_irq_get() may return all possible signed values, such as Linux
> error code. Fix the code to handle this properly.
>
> Fixes: be2dc859abd4 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add irq
> support (for sparx5)")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Btw. do we care about EPROBE_DEFER?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists