[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220905055617.cup6tloqxurqznmo@yy-desk-7060>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 13:56:17 +0800
From: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/22] KVM: Provide more information in kernel log if
hardware enabling fails
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 07:17:40PM -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> Provide the name of the calling function to hardware_enable_nolock() and
> include it in the error message to provide additional information on
> exactly what path failed.
>
> Opportunistically bump the pr_info() to pr_warn(), failure to enable
> virtualization support is warn-worthy as _something_ is wrong with the
> system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216031528.92558-4-chao.gao@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...el.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4243a9541543..278eb6cc7cbe 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4991,7 +4991,7 @@ static struct miscdevice kvm_dev = {
> &kvm_chardev_ops,
> };
>
> -static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk)
> +static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *caller_name)
> {
> int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> int r;
> @@ -5006,7 +5006,8 @@ static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk)
> if (r) {
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus_hardware_enabled);
> atomic_inc(&hardware_enable_failed);
> - pr_info("kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d failed\n", cpu);
> + pr_warn("kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d failed during %s()\n",
> + cpu, (const char *)caller_name);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -5014,7 +5015,7 @@ static int kvm_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> raw_spin_lock(&kvm_count_lock);
> if (kvm_usage_count)
> - hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
> + hardware_enable_nolock((void *)__func__);
> raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_count_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -5063,7 +5064,7 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void)
> kvm_usage_count++;
> if (kvm_usage_count == 1) {
> atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0);
> - on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, NULL, 1);
> + on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, (void *)__func__, 1);
>
> if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) {
> hardware_disable_all_nolock();
> @@ -5686,7 +5687,7 @@ static void kvm_resume(void)
> {
> if (kvm_usage_count) {
> lockdep_assert_not_held(&kvm_count_lock);
> - hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
> + hardware_enable_nolock((void *)__func__);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists