[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b25e377dc1272f7bb45cbb9ea1a99887@milecki.pl>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:16:31 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL
setup
On 2022-08-03 04:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> After commit 31fd9b79dc58 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: update CRU block
> description") a warning from clk-iproc-pll.c was generated due to a
> duplicate PLL name as well as the console stopped working. Upon closer
> inspection it became clear that iproc_pll_clk_setup() used the Device
> Tree node unit name as an unique identifier as well as a parent name to
> parent all clocks under the PLL.
>
> BCM5301X was the first platform on which that got noticed because of
> the
> DT node unit name renaming but the same assumptions hold true for any
> user of the iproc_pll_clk_setup() function.
>
> The first 'clock-output-names' property is always guaranteed to be
> unique as well as providing the actual desired PLL clock name, so we
> utilize that to register the PLL and as a parent name of all children
> clock.
>
> Fixes: 5fe225c105fd ("clk: iproc: add initial common clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
One nitpick below.
> ---
> Rafal,
>
> This is a replacement for this patch that you checked into OpenWrt:
>
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.15/320-ARM-dts-BCM5301X-Switch-back-to-old-clock-nodes-name.patch;h=cee37732ab9e2ac8bc2a399a53d01b9ead756cb8;hb=HEAD
>
>
> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
> b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
> index 33da30f99c79..92be88eb1d11 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
> @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> const char *parent_name;
> struct iproc_clk *iclk_array;
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
> + const char *clk_name;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!pll_ctrl) || WARN_ON(!clk_ctrl))
> return;
> @@ -783,7 +784,12 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> iclk = &iclk_array[0];
> iclk->pll = pll;
>
> - init.name = node->name;
> + ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
> + 0, &clk_name);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + goto err_pll_register;
> +
> + init.name = clk_name;
> init.ops = &iproc_pll_ops;
> init.flags = 0;
> parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
> @@ -803,13 +809,12 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node
> *node,
> goto err_pll_register;
>
> clk_data->hws[0] = &iclk->hw;
> + parent_name = clk_name;
>
> /* now initialize and register all leaf clocks */
> for (i = 1; i < num_clks; i++) {
> - const char *clk_name;
>
> memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init));
You could probably get rid of that empty line above memset().
> - parent_name = node->name;
>
> ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
> i, &clk_name);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists