| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220905073140.lrsrbyu2zhkiki5a@kamzik>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:31:40 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@...ux.dev>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Add test for RAZ/WI AArch32 ID
registers
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:48:03PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Add a test to assert that KVM handles the AArch64 views of the AArch32
> ID registers as RAZ/WI (writable only from userspace).
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> .../kvm/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> index d625a3f83780..4331af62a982 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs
> /aarch64/arch_timer
> /aarch64/debug-exceptions
> /aarch64/get-reg-list
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 4c122f1b1737..efe155259095 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += system_counter_offset_test
> # Compiled outputs used by test targets
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_x86_64 += x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test
>
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/arch_timer
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/debug-exceptions
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/get-reg-list
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..704a3e7524a8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/aarch64_only_id_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * aarch64_only_id_regs - Test for ID register behavior on AArch64-only systems
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
> + *
> + * Test that KVM handles the AArch64 views of the AArch32 ID registers as RAZ
> + * and WI from userspace.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "processor.h"
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +
> +#define BAD_ID_REG_VAL 0x1badc0deul
> +
> +#define GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(reg) GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(read_sysreg_s(reg), 0)
> +
> +static void guest_main(void)
> +{
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_MVFR0_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_MVFR1_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_MVFR2_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_REG_RAZ(SYS_ID_MMFR5_EL1);
> +
> + GUEST_DONE();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_guest_raz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct ucall uc;
> +
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> +
> + switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> + case UCALL_ABORT:
> + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
> + break;
> + case UCALL_DONE:
> + break;
> + default:
> + TEST_FAIL("Unexpected ucall: %lu", uc.cmd);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t reg_ids[] = {
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR0_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR1_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR2_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1),
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR5_EL1),
Hi Oliver,
I see all the hidden and unallocated registers have been filtered out of
the test lists. They should also behave as RAZ, right? Maybe we should
keep them in the lists here for consistency and to test them as well.
Thanks,
drew
> +};
> +
> +static void test_user_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(reg_ids); i++) {
> + uint64_t reg_id = reg_ids[i];
> + uint64_t val;
> +
> + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_id, &val);
> + ASSERT_EQ(val, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Expect the ioctl to succeed with no effect on the register
> + * value.
> + */
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, reg_id, BAD_ID_REG_VAL);
> +
> + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_id, &val);
> + ASSERT_EQ(val, 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool vcpu_aarch64_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + uint64_t val, el0;
> +
> + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), &val);
> +
> + el0 = (val & ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL0)) >> ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT;
> + return el0 == ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_64BIT_ONLY;
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +
> + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_main);
> +
> + TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_aarch64_only(vcpu));
> +
> + ucall_init(vm, NULL);
> +
> + test_user_raz_wi(vcpu);
> + test_guest_raz(vcpu);
> +
> + ucall_uninit(vm);
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> --
> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists