[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxVYEhsI9CGKtJZb@gao-cwp>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:59:46 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<isaku.yamahata@...il.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] KVM: x86: Drop kvm_user_return_msr_cpu_online()
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 07:17:36PM -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
>- user_return_msrs = alloc_percpu(struct kvm_user_return_msrs);
>+ /*
>+ * __GFP_ZERO to ensure user_return_msrs.values[].initialized = false.
^ should be user_return_msrs.initialized
With this fixed,
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists