[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJedcCweHjD78F7iydiq6Xc2iH=t_3m=H9JKnaCooToUk32FvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:46:09 +0800
From: Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To: xmzyshypnc <1002992920@...com>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com,
zhi.a.wang@...el.com, alex000young@...il.com,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix double-free bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry.
I rewrote the letter. Hope it works.
There is a double-free security bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry.
Here is a calling chain :
ppgtt_populate_spt->ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry->split_2MB_gtt_entry.
If intel_gvt_dma_map_guest_page failed, it will call
ppgtt_invalidate_spt, which will finally call ppgtt_free_spt and
kfree(spt). But the caller does not notice that, and it will call
ppgtt_free_spt again in error path.
Fix this by returning the result of ppgtt_invalidate_spt to split_2MB_gtt_entry.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
index ce0eb03709c3..9f14fded8c0c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ static int split_2MB_gtt_entry(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
ret = intel_gvt_dma_map_guest_page(vgpu, start_gfn + sub_index,
PAGE_SIZE, &dma_addr);
if (ret) {
- ppgtt_invalidate_spt(spt);
+ ret = ppgtt_invalidate_spt(spt);
return ret;
}
sub_se.val64 = se->val64;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists