[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220905102754.1942-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:27:54 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: remove unneeded return value of bio_check_ro()
bio_check_ro() always return false now. Remove this unneeded return value
and cleanup the sole caller. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a0d1104c5590..fe6b27e3a513 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -487,18 +487,15 @@ static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void)
late_initcall(fail_make_request_debugfs);
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */
-static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio)
+static inline void bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio)
{
if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)) && bdev_read_only(bio->bi_bdev)) {
if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) && !bio_sectors(bio))
- return false;
+ return;
pr_warn("Trying to write to read-only block-device %pg\n",
bio->bi_bdev);
/* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */
- return false;
}
-
- return false;
}
static noinline int should_fail_bio(struct bio *bio)
@@ -722,8 +719,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
if (should_fail_bio(bio))
goto end_io;
- if (unlikely(bio_check_ro(bio)))
- goto end_io;
+ bio_check_ro(bio);
if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_REMAPPED)) {
if (unlikely(bio_check_eod(bio)))
goto end_io;
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists