lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxXUHPWtyrt6kNI1@sleipner.dyn.berto.se>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:49:00 +0200
From:   Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn for non-standard fixes tag style

Hi Joe,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 2022-08-29 23:06:43 -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> > +			if ($line =~ 
> > /(fixes:)\s+([0-9a-f]{5,})\s+($balanced_parens)/i) {
> 
> Maybe use fixes:? so the colon is not required in poorly formed uses

I tried that but I think it brings more problems then it is worth. With 
that change the check would run for each line of the commit message that 
begins with the string 'fixes', not just in the tags section of the 
message. So it would warn for the commit message,

    The work on foo and bar introduced a bug that can be
    fixed by doing baz.

I think it's for this reason other checks for tags include the ':'.

> 
> > +				my $tag = $1;
> > +				$orig_commit = $2;
> > +				$title = $3;
> > +
> > +				$tag_case = 0 if $tag eq "Fixes:";
> > +				$tag_space = 0 if ($line =~ /^fixes: [0-9a-f]{5,} ($balanced_parens)/i);
> 
> fixes:? here too
> 
> Pity there's no simple way to consolidate this git commit test block
> with the existing git id commit block.

I agree.

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ