[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6a498e7-838b-addf-bc7f-81e6805806d3@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:22:55 +0000
From: <Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com>
To: <lee@...nel.org>
CC: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
<radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>, <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
<admin@...iphile.com>, <Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,at91-usart: convert to
json-schema
On 05.09.2022 17:37, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com wrote:
>
>> On 18.08.2022 11:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2022 10:55, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>>> Convert at91 USART DT Binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to
>>>> json-schema format.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt | 98 ---------
>>>> 2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..cf15d73fa1e8
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>> One more thing - I think this should be in serial directory, not mfd,
>>> even though it includes SPI. MFD is just a Linux naming/wrapper device.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> I would rather keep it in this directory, since its corresponding driver
>> is also in the mfd directory.
>
> Looks like a UART driver to me.
>
> Which MFD driver does this pertain to?
>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Hi,
It's this one: drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c[1]
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc4/source/drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c
Regards,
Sergiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists