| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAP01T750hFZbHdRTzSSeWpc95Omp2-PLmOojhMohFGJD=yrTzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 05:15:01 +0200
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, shuah@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
deso@...teo.net, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for dynamic pointers
parameters in kfuncs
On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 16:36, Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> Add tests to ensure that only supported dynamic pointer types are accepted,
> that the passed argument is actually a dynamic pointer, and that the passed
> argument is a pointer to the stack.
>
> The tests are currently in the deny list for s390x (JIT does not support
> calling kernel function).
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 +
> .../bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 57 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> index 4e305baa5277..9a6dc3671c65 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> @@ -71,3 +71,4 @@ cgroup_hierarchical_stats # JIT does not support calling kernel f
> htab_update # failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 (trampoline)
> lookup_key # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> verify_pkcs7_sig # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> +kfunc_dynptr_param # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ea655a5c9d8b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Facebook
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH
> + *
> + * Author: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include "test_kfunc_dynptr_param.skel.h"
> +
> +static size_t log_buf_sz = 1048576; /* 1 MB */
> +static char obj_log_buf[1048576];
> +
> +static struct {
> + const char *prog_name;
> + const char *expected_err_msg;
> +} kfunc_dynptr_tests[] = {
> + {"dynptr_type_not_supp",
> + "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern points to unsupported dynamic pointer type"},
> + {"not_valid_dynptr",
> + "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern must be valid and initialized"},
> + {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern not to stack"},
> +};
> +
> +static bool kfunc_not_supported;
> +
> +static int libbpf_print_cb(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *fmt,
> + va_list args)
> +{
> + if (strcmp(fmt, "libbpf: extern (func ksym) '%s': not found in kernel or module BTFs\n"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (strcmp(va_arg(args, char *), "bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + kfunc_not_supported = true;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg)
> +{
> + struct test_kfunc_dynptr_param *skel;
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
> + libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_cb;
> + struct bpf_program *prog;
> + int err;
> +
> + opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf;
> + opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz;
> + opts.kernel_log_level = 1;
> +
> + skel = test_kfunc_dynptr_param__open_opts(&opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_kfunc_dynptr_param__open_opts"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
> +
> + bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.ringbuf, getpagesize());
> +
> + kfunc_not_supported = false;
> +
> + old_print_cb = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_cb);
> + err = test_kfunc_dynptr_param__load(skel);
> + libbpf_set_print(old_print_cb);
> +
> + if (err < 0 && kfunc_not_supported) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "%s:SKIP:bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc not supported\n",
> + __func__);
> + test__skip();
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg);
> + fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf);
> + }
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_kfunc_dynptr_param__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +void test_kfunc_dynptr_param(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kfunc_dynptr_tests); i++) {
> + if (!test__start_subtest(kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].prog_name))
> + continue;
> +
> + verify_fail(kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].prog_name,
> + kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].expected_err_msg);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2f09f91a1576
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH
> + *
> + * Author: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +struct bpf_dynptr {
> + __u64 :64;
> + __u64 :64;
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> +extern int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr,
> + struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr,
> + struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) __ksym;
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
> +} ringbuf SEC(".maps");
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf")
> +int BPF_PROG(dynptr_type_not_supp, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
> + unsigned int size)
> +{
> + char write_data[64] = "hello there, world!!";
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(&ringbuf, sizeof(write_data), 0, &ptr);
> +
> + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(&ptr, &ptr, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf")
> +int BPF_PROG(not_valid_dynptr, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
> +
> + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature((struct bpf_dynptr *)&val,
> + (struct bpf_dynptr *)&val, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf")
> +int BPF_PROG(not_ptr_to_stack, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
> +
> + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature((struct bpf_dynptr *)val,
> + (struct bpf_dynptr *)val, NULL);
Please also include a test where you cause the dynptr to be set to
NULL, e.g. by passing invalid stuff to ringbuf_reserve_dynptr, and
then try to pass it to bpf_verify_pkc7_signature.
> +}
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists