[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxdXZbFBHIevYwRz@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:21:25 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> 64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone.
> Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough).
>
> To allow testing userspace support for >64 devices, add additional DRM
> modparam (skip_legacy_minors) which causes DRM to skip allocating minors
> in 0-192 range.
> Additionally - one minor tweak around minor DRM IDR locking and IDR lockdep
> annotations.
The IDR is deprecated; rather than making all these changes around
the IDR, could you convert it to use the XArray instead? I did it
once before, but those patches bounced off the submissions process.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists