[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55bc9edd-f76a-c875-1b94-54f2f7fe4446@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:19:29 +0800
From: "zhangjianhua (E)" <chris.zjh@...wei.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3] rtc: fsl-ftm-alarm: Use module_init and add
module_exit
This is a good idea, thanks.
在 2022/9/5 21:17, Rasmus Villemoes 写道:
> On 05/09/2022 08.26, Zhang Jianhua wrote:
>> fsl-ftm-alarm driver can be built out of tree, so change the
>> macro device_initcall() to module_init() for standard usage.
> "out of tree" usually refers to modules that are not part of the
> mainline kernel.
>
> "can be built as a module" is more accurate and less confusing.
>
>> fsl-ftm-alarm registers a platform driver in module_init function,
>> however there is no module_exit function to unregister it, and it will
>> occur resource leak, so add ftm_alarm_exit() function for module_exit.
> It seems that you can avoid a lot of boilerplate using the
> module_platform_driver macro. The single line
>
> module_platform_driver(ftm_rtc_driver);
>
> should/could replace the ftm_alarm_init/ftm_alarm_exit functions and the
> explicit module_init()/module_exit() lines.
>
> Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists