linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKdAkRTHCmyYFX1yy8M1mTtT9D_h66Yj=0UUdEEwjCq4ia4z4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 20:55:27 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sam Nelson <sam.nelson@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for
 Keystone 2 DSPs

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:55 AM Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 06/25/2017 03:15 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue 13 Jun 16:45 PDT 2017, Suman Anna wrote:
> >
> >> +static int keystone_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv;
> >> +    int ret;
> >> +
> >> +    INIT_WORK(&ksproc->workqueue, handle_event);
> >> +
> >> +    ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_ring, keystone_rproc_vring_interrupt, 0,
> >> +                      dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc);
> >> +    if (ret) {
> >> +            dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable vring interrupt, ret = %d\n",
> >> +                    ret);
> >> +            goto out;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_fault, keystone_rproc_exception_interrupt,
> >> +                      0, dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc);
> >> +    if (ret) {
> >> +            dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable exception interrupt, ret = %d\n",
> >> +                    ret);
> >> +            goto free_vring_irq;
> >> +    }
> >
> > I do prefer that your request any resources during probe() and
> > potentially enable/disable them here. If below concern about using a
> > GPIO driver is cleared already I'll take it as is though.
> >
> > [..]
> >> +static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv;
> >> +
> >> +    if (WARN_ON(ksproc->kick_gpio < 0))
> >> +            return;
> >> +
> >> +    gpio_set_value(ksproc->kick_gpio, 1);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > This doesn't sound like a gpio-controller and the GPIO maintainer did
> > reject an attempt by me to use the GPIO framework to abstract a similar
> > thing. Do you already have this driver upstream or have you clarified
> > with the maintainer that the GPIO framework is an acceptable abstraction
> > for this?
>
> Yeah, this has been upstream since quite some time. See commit
> 2134cb997f2f ("gpio: syscon: reuse for keystone 2 socs").

Sorry for the thread necromancy, but was it intentional that the
driver only parses DT to find this "GPIO" but never requests/reserves
it? I would like to drop of_get_named_gpio_flags() in favor of a more
standard dev_get_gpiod().

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry