lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:13:21 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc:     cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Reorganize css_set_lock and kernfs path
 processing

Hello, Michal.

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> I considered adding get_cgroup() into current_cgns_cgroup_from_root to
> avoid reliance on the transitive pinning via css_set. 
> After reasoning about no asynchronous NS switch and v1 hiearchies kill_sb it
> didn't seem to bring that much benefit (it didn't compose well with
> BUG_ON(!cgrp) neither).

I still think this is too subtle and incidental. If we go this way, we'd
need to add comments explaining why this obviously confusing pattern (lock,
find obj, unlock, use obj) is being used which goes into how the object is
directly pinned through the css_set which happens to be pinned also
because... and so on. Even if the code looks a bit uglier, I'd much prefer
straight-forward pinning.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ