[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220906004554.btzmcjqox4n3hdtf@notapiano>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 20:45:54 -0400
From: NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado <n@...aprado.net>
To: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>,
Tom Fitzhenry <tom@...-fitzhenry.me.uk>,
Caleb Connolly <kc@...tmarketos.org>,
Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix SD card controller probe on
Pinephone Pro
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:36:47AM +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote:
> Voltage constraints on vccio_sd are invalid. They don't match the voltages
> that LDO9 can generate, and this causes rk808-regulator driver to fail
> to probe with -EINVAL when it tries to apply the constraints during boot.
>
> Fix the constraints to something that LDO9 can be actually configured for.
>
> Fixes: 78a21c7d5952 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro")
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> index f00c80361377a..2e058c3150256 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> @@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ regulator-state-mem {
>
> vccio_sd: LDO_REG9 {
> regulator-name = "vccio_sd";
> - regulator-min-microvolt = <1710000>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <3150000>;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
Shouldn't the maximum be 3.1V? The SDMMC0_VDD pin on RK3399 that this regulator
is connected to expects a maximum voltage of 3.15V, so 3.3V would be too high.
The output voltage for LDO9 is configured in 100mV steps, so I imagine that's
why 3.15V fails, but 3.1V should work fine. I haven't tested yet though.
Thanks,
NĂcolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists