linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nvmet: fix mar and mor off-by-one errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8154fb0a-4cda-a4bc-29ef-8435a3edb264@opensource.wdc.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 07:35:04 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
        Dennis Maisenbacher <Dennis.Maisenbacher@....com>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmet: fix mar and mor off-by-one errors

On 9/7/22 06:53, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 9/6/22 00:39, Dennis Maisenbacher wrote:
>> From: Dennis Maisenbacher <dennis.maisenbacher@....com>
>>
>> Maximum Active Resources (MAR) and Maximum Open Resources (MOR) are 0's
>> based vales where a value of 0xffffffff indicates that there is no limit.
>>
>> Decrement the values that are returned by bdev_max_open_zones and
>> bdev_max_active_zones as the block layer helpers are not 0's based.
>> A 0 returned by the block layer helpers indicates no limit, thus convert
>> it to 0xffffffff (U32_MAX).
>>
>> Fixes: aaf2e048af27 ("nvmet: add ZBD over ZNS backend support")
>> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dennis Maisenbacher <dennis.maisenbacher@....com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>      - Add explicit check if block layer helpers return a 0 and if so
>>      convert it to U32_MAX.
>>      - Add Fixes tag.
>>
>>   drivers/nvme/target/zns.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/zns.c b/drivers/nvme/target/zns.c
>> index c7ef69f29fe4..eae81f939067 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/zns.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/zns.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void nvmet_execute_identify_cns_cs_ns(struct nvmet_req *req)
>>   	struct nvme_id_ns_zns *id_zns;
>>   	u64 zsze;
>>   	u16 status;
>> +	u32 mar, mor;
> 
> consider :-
>   +	u32 mar, mor;
>     	u64 zsze;
>     	u16 status;
> 
>>   
>>   	if (le32_to_cpu(req->cmd->identify.nsid) == NVME_NSID_ALL) {
>>   		req->error_loc = offsetof(struct nvme_identify, nsid);
>> @@ -130,8 +131,20 @@ void nvmet_execute_identify_cns_cs_ns(struct nvmet_req *req)
>>   	zsze = (bdev_zone_sectors(req->ns->bdev) << 9) >>
>>   					req->ns->blksize_shift;
>>   	id_zns->lbafe[0].zsze = cpu_to_le64(zsze);
>> -	id_zns->mor = cpu_to_le32(bdev_max_open_zones(req->ns->bdev));
>> -	id_zns->mar = cpu_to_le32(bdev_max_active_zones(req->ns->bdev));
>> +
>> +	mor = bdev_max_open_zones(req->ns->bdev);
>> +	if (!mor)
>> +		mor = U32_MAX;
>> +	else
>> +		--mor;
>> +	id_zns->mor = cpu_to_le32(mor);
>> +
>> +	mar = bdev_max_active_zones(req->ns->bdev);
>> +	if (!mar)
>> +		mar = U32_MAX;
>> +	else
>> +		--mar;
>> +	id_zns->mar = cpu_to_le32(mar);
>>   
> 
> above 14 lines of code can be simplified as in 4-5 lines :-

Simplified ? It is much harder to read in my opinion...

> 
> mor = bdev_max_open_zones(req->ns->bdev);
> id->zns->mor = cpu_tp_le32(mor ? mor - 1 : U32_MAX);
> 
> mar = bdev_max_active_zones(req->ns->bdev);
> id->zns->mar = cpu_tp_le32(mar ? mar - 1 : U32_MAX);
> 
>>   done:
>>   	status = nvmet_copy_to_sgl(req, 0, id_zns, sizeof(*id_zns));
> 
> 
> either way,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
> 

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research