lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:22:42 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@....com>,
        Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@....com>,
        Julien Grall <jgrall@...zon.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't reserve persistent memory for Xen domain

On Tue, 06 Sep 2022 03:40:40 +0100,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> For GICv3 with its redistributor, the driver needs to reserve the
> persistent memory for LPI configuration and pending tables, so the
> reserved pages will not be overwritten by secondary kernel launched by
> kexec, the hardware can continue to use the pages for maintenance
> LPI states.
> 
> When kernel runs in Xen domain, Xen uses FDT with encapsulating ACPI
> table in device tree.  Therefore, the EFI stub is not invoked and
> the memreserve table is not installed, this leads to the memory
> cannot be reserved as persistent region and kernel reports oops:
> 
> [    0.403737] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    0.403738] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 0 at drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c:3074 its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [    0.403745] Modules linked in:
> [    0.403748] CPU: 30 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/30 Tainted: G        W         5.15.23-ampere-lts-standard #1
> [    0.403752] pstate: 600001c5 (nZCv dAIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [    0.403755] pc : its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [    0.403758] lr : its_cpu_init+0x810/0xae0
> [    0.403761] sp : ffff800009c03ce0
> [    0.403762] x29: ffff800009c03ce0 x28: 000000000000001e x27: ffff880711f43000
> [    0.403767] x26: ffff80000a3c0070 x25: fffffc1ffe0a4400 x24: ffff80000a3c0000
> [    0.403770] x23: ffff8000095bc998 x22: ffff8000090a6000 x21: ffff800009850cb0
> [    0.403774] x20: ffff800009701a10 x19: ffff800009701000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [    0.403777] x17: 3030303035303031 x16: 3030313030303078 x15: 303a30206e6f6967
> [    0.403780] x14: 6572206530312072 x13: 3030303030353030 x12: 3130303130303030
> [    0.403784] x11: 78303a30206e6f69 x10: 6765722065303120 x9 : ffff80000870e710
> [    0.403788] x8 : 6964657220646e75 x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 : 0000000000000000
> [    0.403791] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : fffffc0000000000 x3 : 0000000000000010
> [    0.403794] x2 : 000000000000ffff x1 : 0000000000010000 x0 : 00000000ffffffed
> [    0.403798] Call trace:
> [    0.403799]  its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [    0.403802]  gic_starting_cpu+0x48/0x90
> [    0.403805]  cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x16c/0x5b0
> [    0.403808]  cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x78/0xf0
> [    0.403811]  notify_cpu_starting+0xbc/0xdc
> [    0.403814]  secondary_start_kernel+0xe0/0x170
> [    0.403817]  __secondary_switched+0x94/0x98
> [    0.403821] ---[ end trace f68728a0d3053b70 ]---
> 
> GICv3 interrupt controller is emulated by Xen hypervisor, this means the
> LPI configuration table and pending table allocated by Linux kernel are
> only emulated by software by not accessed by hardware, so it has no risk
> to introduce race condition between the secondary kernel launched by
> kexec and the physical interrupt controller.  And when the secondary
> kernel is booting, it uses totally separate memory region from the
> primary kernel, the secondary kernel can allocate its own LPI
> configuration table and pending table and register them into Xen
> hypervisor afterwards.
> 
> If look into the GIC implementation, LPI serves for message-based
> interrupts (MSI), it comes from ITS or directly from MSI, and at the end
> forward LPI to redistributor.  This means the physical LPIs are received
> in Xen hypervisor (in EL2) and sets List Register for virtual CPU
> interface (consumed in EL1).  Furthermore, to support the emulated LPIs,
> the first question is how to connect virtual GICv3 with MSI, and then
> it also requires Xen to emulate the ITS and redistributor; so far, Xen
> hypervisor doesn't really emulate these hardware mechanism thus the
> allocated LPI tables in Linux are not used by Xen hypervisor.
> 
> For above reasons, this patch simply skips to reserve persistent memory
> for Xen domain so can mute the useless oops.
> 
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@....com>
> Cc: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@....com>
> Cc: Julien Grall <jgrall@...zon.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 5ff09de6c48f..9ba9984401de 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>  #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h>
>  
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +
>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>  #include <asm/exception.h>
>  
> @@ -2220,6 +2222,21 @@ static bool gic_check_reserved_range(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
>  
>  static int gic_reserve_range(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * When kernel runs in Xen domain, it misses to invoke the EFI stub,
> +	 * thus the memreserve table is not installed; in this case, the
> +	 * memory cannot be reserved as persistent region.
> +	 *
> +	 * On the other hand, the GICv3 controller is emulated by Xen
> +	 * hypervisor, given a redistrubitor its LPI pending table and
> +	 * configuration table are emulated by software but not manipulated
> +	 * by hardware.  Therefore, it's not necessary to reserve them, for
> +	 * kexec/kdump the secondary kernel can allocate new pages for these
> +	 * two tables.
> +	 */
> +	if (xen_domain())
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (efi_enabled(EFI_CONFIG_TABLES))
>  		return efi_mem_reserve_persistent(addr, size);
>  

No, never. The driver follows the architecture to the letter, and I'm
not going to pollute it because Xen is broken.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ