[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sfl5uiml.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:22:42 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@....com>,
Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@....com>,
Julien Grall <jgrall@...zon.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't reserve persistent memory for Xen domain
On Tue, 06 Sep 2022 03:40:40 +0100,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> For GICv3 with its redistributor, the driver needs to reserve the
> persistent memory for LPI configuration and pending tables, so the
> reserved pages will not be overwritten by secondary kernel launched by
> kexec, the hardware can continue to use the pages for maintenance
> LPI states.
>
> When kernel runs in Xen domain, Xen uses FDT with encapsulating ACPI
> table in device tree. Therefore, the EFI stub is not invoked and
> the memreserve table is not installed, this leads to the memory
> cannot be reserved as persistent region and kernel reports oops:
>
> [ 0.403737] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.403738] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 0 at drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c:3074 its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [ 0.403745] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.403748] CPU: 30 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/30 Tainted: G W 5.15.23-ampere-lts-standard #1
> [ 0.403752] pstate: 600001c5 (nZCv dAIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 0.403755] pc : its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [ 0.403758] lr : its_cpu_init+0x810/0xae0
> [ 0.403761] sp : ffff800009c03ce0
> [ 0.403762] x29: ffff800009c03ce0 x28: 000000000000001e x27: ffff880711f43000
> [ 0.403767] x26: ffff80000a3c0070 x25: fffffc1ffe0a4400 x24: ffff80000a3c0000
> [ 0.403770] x23: ffff8000095bc998 x22: ffff8000090a6000 x21: ffff800009850cb0
> [ 0.403774] x20: ffff800009701a10 x19: ffff800009701000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 0.403777] x17: 3030303035303031 x16: 3030313030303078 x15: 303a30206e6f6967
> [ 0.403780] x14: 6572206530312072 x13: 3030303030353030 x12: 3130303130303030
> [ 0.403784] x11: 78303a30206e6f69 x10: 6765722065303120 x9 : ffff80000870e710
> [ 0.403788] x8 : 6964657220646e75 x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 : 0000000000000000
> [ 0.403791] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : fffffc0000000000 x3 : 0000000000000010
> [ 0.403794] x2 : 000000000000ffff x1 : 0000000000010000 x0 : 00000000ffffffed
> [ 0.403798] Call trace:
> [ 0.403799] its_cpu_init+0x814/0xae0
> [ 0.403802] gic_starting_cpu+0x48/0x90
> [ 0.403805] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x16c/0x5b0
> [ 0.403808] cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x78/0xf0
> [ 0.403811] notify_cpu_starting+0xbc/0xdc
> [ 0.403814] secondary_start_kernel+0xe0/0x170
> [ 0.403817] __secondary_switched+0x94/0x98
> [ 0.403821] ---[ end trace f68728a0d3053b70 ]---
>
> GICv3 interrupt controller is emulated by Xen hypervisor, this means the
> LPI configuration table and pending table allocated by Linux kernel are
> only emulated by software by not accessed by hardware, so it has no risk
> to introduce race condition between the secondary kernel launched by
> kexec and the physical interrupt controller. And when the secondary
> kernel is booting, it uses totally separate memory region from the
> primary kernel, the secondary kernel can allocate its own LPI
> configuration table and pending table and register them into Xen
> hypervisor afterwards.
>
> If look into the GIC implementation, LPI serves for message-based
> interrupts (MSI), it comes from ITS or directly from MSI, and at the end
> forward LPI to redistributor. This means the physical LPIs are received
> in Xen hypervisor (in EL2) and sets List Register for virtual CPU
> interface (consumed in EL1). Furthermore, to support the emulated LPIs,
> the first question is how to connect virtual GICv3 with MSI, and then
> it also requires Xen to emulate the ITS and redistributor; so far, Xen
> hypervisor doesn't really emulate these hardware mechanism thus the
> allocated LPI tables in Linux are not used by Xen hypervisor.
>
> For above reasons, this patch simply skips to reserve persistent memory
> for Xen domain so can mute the useless oops.
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@....com>
> Cc: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@....com>
> Cc: Julien Grall <jgrall@...zon.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 5ff09de6c48f..9ba9984401de 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h>
>
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> #include <asm/exception.h>
>
> @@ -2220,6 +2222,21 @@ static bool gic_check_reserved_range(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
>
> static int gic_reserve_range(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
> {
> + /*
> + * When kernel runs in Xen domain, it misses to invoke the EFI stub,
> + * thus the memreserve table is not installed; in this case, the
> + * memory cannot be reserved as persistent region.
> + *
> + * On the other hand, the GICv3 controller is emulated by Xen
> + * hypervisor, given a redistrubitor its LPI pending table and
> + * configuration table are emulated by software but not manipulated
> + * by hardware. Therefore, it's not necessary to reserve them, for
> + * kexec/kdump the secondary kernel can allocate new pages for these
> + * two tables.
> + */
> + if (xen_domain())
> + return 0;
> +
> if (efi_enabled(EFI_CONFIG_TABLES))
> return efi_mem_reserve_persistent(addr, size);
>
No, never. The driver follows the architecture to the letter, and I'm
not going to pollute it because Xen is broken.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists