[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93600263-0211-9286-9043-fae5b017d15b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:03:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, kishon@...com,
vkoul@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
grygorii.strashko@...com, rogerq@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti: phy-gmii-sel: Add bindings
for J7200
On 06/09/2022 07:02, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>>
>>> Please let me know if the above description is fine.
>>
>> Hm, but that's a phy node, not address of register... Isn't this a phy
>> node representing the phy of the CPSW MAC ports?
>
> Despite it being a phy node, the phy-gmii-sel driver actually uses this
> node to obtain the address of the CTRLMMR_ENETx_CTRL registers which
> correspond to the CPSW MAC configuration and are therefore unrelated to
> the PHY. Please let me know if my suggested description would be fine.
Either I miss some more pieces or this is wrong design. The phy node
should not be used to pass some addresses somewhere. It is used to
define a device which will be instantiated (as parent is simple-mfd). If
you use it only to obtain some address, not to describe child device,
then this is wrong property type.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists