linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Custom Kconfig for KUnit is no longer needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 10:12:11 +0200
From:   Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
CC:     <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Custom Kconfig for KUnit is no longer needed

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:37:00AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 9/6/22 01:47, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> > References: commit 6fc3a8636a7b ("kunit: tool: Enable virtio/PCI by default on UML")
> 
> Use Fixes: tag for bugfix patches instead.

Can documentation update (when the referenced patch didn't touch the docs)
really be treated as a bugfix?
Or is it just a reference, validating the reasoning behind this patch?

-Michał

> 
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara